During a recent post about youtube.com going down, I was having a good time reading the comments (Never actually went to the story). Most of the comments were in one of two buckets; “this items is stupid and shouldn’t be on the homepage” (usually in all CAPS), or people trying to come up with oneliners about the situation. Then the post was buried, but why? Yes, youtube came back online, maybe the story wasn’t relevant anymore, but there was over 200 comments on the article, people must have been enjoying it on some level. So what’s more important: the articles or the comments?
In the youtube post, clearly the blog post about youtube going down was not interesting. Everyone just wanted to see the 404 on www.youtube.com. But with almost as many comments as diggs, people were clearly having fun, so in this case I guess the comments won. There are occasions where I do read the article the post links to, but I always read the comments. This isn’t just with Digg, when I go to Slashdot I do the same thing. If the story is even remotely interesting, I always read the comments, whether or not I read the article.
Read more…